Make manufacturers pay for recycling? Calgary councillor says it’s time

.

Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
LinkedIn
Email

Coun. Peter Demong to introduce notice of motion for Extended Producer Responsibility
Lucie Edwardson · CBC News · Posted: Jan 28, 2019 6:37 AM MT | Last Updated: an hour ago
Coun. Peter Demong says he’ll be asking the city to put $50,000 towards studying the impacts of EPR. (CBC)

A Calgary city councillor wants to make changes to who pays to deal with recyclables in this city.

Peter Demong, councillor for Ward 14, is introducing a notice of motion next week asking the city to push the provincial government to look into Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR).

Private garbage collection will save money but Calgary shouldn’t do it, suggests report

It’s a concept Demong says shifts the costs of managing recyclable materials off the backs of municipalities and on to the companies that produce the stuff in the first place.

“Alberta stands alone in not having any kind of province-wide producer responsibility,” he said.
Extended producer responsibility means the companies that produce products must cover the recycling costs for their entire life cycle. (Norma Jean MacPhee/CBC)

Demong says municipalities aren’t even authorized to to implement any kind of producer responsibility.

“It has to be a provincial act,” he said.

The notice of motion will be brought to the council chambers on Feb. 4, and it’s expected municipalities all over the province will show their support for EPR with similar motions.

It’s aimed at making the companies that produce the recyclable products have to pay the costs for their entire life cycles.

Premier Rachel Notley says it’s an issue that’s come to the province’s attention relatively recently.

“It has implications for manufacturers and retailers and producers. So, we’ll need to look at the whole picture,” she said. “But certainly the principle is one that is worthy of our consideration and that’s why we will take a look at it.”